Connect with us

2021 F1

Full verdict released; FIA rejected Mercedes’ review request

Published

on

Max Verstappen 2021 F1

Formula 1 governing body FIA have rejected Mercedes’ request for a review of Max Verstappen’s driving during the Brazilian Grand Prix.
Mercedes and Red Bull F1 team representatives appeared on Thursday in Qatar for analysis, debates went on overnight before the decision was announced ahead of the second practice session on Friday.

The Competitor provided the Stewards with a letter dated 16 November 2021 with Appendices setting out its arguments in support of the Petition.

Pursuant to Art. 14 of the ISC, a petition for review must be filed against a Stewards’ decision and can only be granted if a Competitor successfully demonstrates “that a significant and relevant new element is discovered which was unavailable to the parties seeking the review at the time of the decision concerned.” Provided that there is a Stewards’ decision, the four key points that the Competitor must demonstrate are that the new element must be (i) Significant, (ii) Relevant (iii) New; and (iv) Unavailable at the time to the parties seeking the review at the time of the decision concerned.

Here, the Competitor points, in particular, to the forward-facing onboard camera footage and the 360° onboard camera footage from Car 33 (the “Footage”), which had to be downloaded after the race as the elements supporting the request for a Right to Review hearing.

It is important to note that the following is not an affirmation or review of the Stewards determination made during the race, but rather is an assessment regarding whether the Right of Review exists.

“The Decision”

With respect to “Incidents during the race”, Art. 47.1 of the 2021 FIA Formula One Sporting Regulations (the “SR”) states:

“The Race Director may report any on-track incident or suspected breach of these Sporting Regulations or the Code (an “Incident”) to the stewards. After review it shall be at the discretion of the stewards to decide whether or not to proceed with an investigation. The stewards may also investigate an Incident noted by themselves.” (emphasis added)

The stewards do not sit passively during a race and did not do so in this case. By the time the Race Director asked the Stewards for their view and stated that it was going to be “Noted” on the timing screens, they were already looking at the available footage. The subsequent discretionary decision of the Stewards not to proceed with a formal investigation is the motor racing equivalent of “Play-On” in other sports.

There will always be some angles of video footage, because of limits in both technology and bandwidth, that are unavailable at the time. Whether or not stewards’ decisions are considered to be right or wrong, and just as with referees’ decisions in soccer, it does not seem desirable to be able to review any or all such in-race discretionary decisions up to two weeks after the fact and the Stewards therefore seriously doubt that the intent of the Right of Review in the ISC is to enable competitors to seek a review of such discretionary decisions that do not follow on from a formal inquiry by the Stewards and do not result in a published document.

Despite the foregoing, Art. 47.1 of the SR applies to the present case as it explicitly states that it is up to “the stewards to decide whether or not to proceed with an investigation”, whereas Art. 14 of the ISC refers to “the decision concerned” (small d). As a result, the Stewards in this very specific case determine that the “Turn 4 incident involving cars 33 (Ver) and 44 (Ham): no investigation necessary” constitutes a decision. Having said that and taking the four above-mentioned key points of the Right of Review in reverse order, the Stewards hereby make the following assessment:

Unavailable

It is undeniable that the Footage was unavailable to the Competitor at the time of the Stewards’ Decision. Only a single channel of video from each car is available to the broadcaster and the Stewards at any given time and during the incident on Lap 48, the camera selected on Car 33 was the rear facing camera. This then means that it is also unavailable to the Competitor. While not available live, all the other cameras are recorded on-board the cars and are available for download post-race. This test is therefore met.

New

Many camera angles are not available live to the competitors but are to the Stewards. So, the Stewards considered whether footage that is simply not broadcast or not available to the competitors should be considered new. This is especially in light of the argument that this type of decision is the equivalent of “play on” in other sports.

The Competitor provided as an exhibit, Document 41 from the 2020 Austrian Grand Prix where the onboard 360° camera in that case, which was unavailable to both the team and the Stewards at the time of the initial hearing, was subsequently available and considered “new” by the Stewards at the time.

The Stewards consider this case to be similar and thus determine the test to be met.

Relevant

The Competitor proposed that the Footage was relevant because it was the only footage that allowed the overall position of the cars, the steering inputs of the driver of Car 33, the heading of the cars and the proximity of the cars to be analysed together. While the Stewards often have to make a decision with a limited set of facts, it is true that in making their review, the front facing camera was one of the angles that the Stewards looked for. The Footage is a direct view of the incident, is not extraneous and is therefore, in the Stewards opinion Relevant.

Significant

Whether this Footage is “significant” is really a question of whether or not it is likely to change the initial decision of the stewards.

In the pertinent example brought forward by the Competitor from Austria in 2020, none of the footage available and viewed at the time of the decision, showed a yellow flag visible to the driver (Lewis Hamilton.) However, the new and previously unavailable 360° camera footage, which was downloaded the next day, clearly showed that the yellow flag was visible from the car and the driver was penalized for failing to slow down. In that case, the footage absolutely changed the decision of the stewards and was thus significant. During the hearing, the Competitor asked that if the Stewards were unconvinced of the significance of the Footage, to be given the opportunity to present its view in that respect. Following the initial part of the hearing, the Stewards gave the Competitor the opportunity to do so, there being precedent for this. The previously unavailable Footage was played, and the Competitor also presented the Footage in a side-by-side comparison with the previous lap.

As noted above, the Stewards often must make a decision quickly and on a limited set of information. At the time of the decision, the Stewards felt they had sufficient information to make a decision, which subsequently broadly aligned with the immediate post-race comments of both drivers involved. Had they felt that the forward-facing camera video from Car 33 was crucial in order to take a decision, they would simply have placed the incident under investigation – to be investigated after the race – and rendered a decision after this video was available. They saw no need to do so.

The Competitor’s position is that this new Footage provides sufficient information for the Stewards to come to an altogether different conclusion than they did previously. However, the Stewards determine that the Footage shows nothing exceptional that is particularly different from the other angles that were available to them at the time, or that particularly changes their decision that was based on the originally available footage. Unlike the 2020 Austria case, in the judgement of the Stewards, there is nothing in the Footage that fundamentally changes the facts. Nor even, does this show anything that wasn’t considered by the Stewards at the time. Thus, the Stewards determine that the Footage, here, is not “Significant.”

Conclusion

The Stewards find, in their sole discretion, that:

With the reservations raised above, the decision is subject to the Right of Review;

– That the Footage is New;
– That the Footage was Unavailable to the Competitor at the time of the decision subject to the petition for review;
– That the Footage is Relevant; but
– That the Footage is not Significant;
– The four key points required under Art. 14.1.1 are not met and the Stewards, therefore, deny the Competitor’s Right of Review.

Competitors are reminded that, in accordance with Art. 14.3 of the ISC, this decision is not subject to appeal.

2022 F1

F1 Championship Points Standing – After Imola GP

Published

on

By

2022 F1 Drivers Championship Standing after F1 Emilia Romagna GP

Pos Driver Team Points
1Charles LeclercFerrari86
2Max VerstappenRed Bull59
3Sergio PerezRed Bull54
4George RussellWilliams49
5Carlos SainzFerrari38
6Lando NorrisMcLaren35
7Lewis HamiltonMercedes28
8Valtteri BottasMercedes24
9Esteban OconAlpine20
10Kevin MagnussenHaas15
11Daniel RicciardoMcLaren11
12Yuki TsunodaAlphaTauri10
13Pierre GaslyAlphaTauri6
14Fernando AlonsoAlpine2
15Zhou GuanyuAlfa Romeo1
16Alex AlbonWilliams1
17Lance StrollAston Martin1
18Mick SchumacherHaas0
19Sebastian VettelAston Martin0
20Nicholas LatifiWilliams0

2022 F1 Teams Championship Standing after F1 Imola Emilia Romagna GP

Pos Team Points
1Ferrari124
2Red Bull113
3Mercedes77
4McLaren46
5Alfa Romeo25
6Alpine22
7AlphaTauri16
8Haas15
9Aston Martin5
10Williams1

Continue Reading

2022 F1

Race results – F1 Imola Emilia Romagna GP

Published

on

By

Defending world champion Max Verstappen has won at Imola for the second season in a row ahead of his teammate Sergio Perez, Red Bull made 1-2 finish as leaders Ferrari’s home Grand Prix turned into a terrible for the Italian outfit.

Pos Driver Team LapsTimePoints
1Max VerstappenRed Bull631:32:07.98626
2Sergio PerezRed Bull63+16.527s18
3Lando NorrisMcLaren63+34.834s15
4George RussellMercedes63+42.506s12
5Valtteri BottasAlfa Romeo63+43.181s10
6Charles LeclercFerrari63+56.072s8
7Yuki TsunodaAlphaTauri63+61.110s6
8Sebastian VettelAston Martin63+70.892s4
9Kevin Magnussen Haas63+75.260s2
10Lance StrollAston Martin62+1 lap1
11Alex Albon Williams62+1 lap0
12Pierre GaslyAlphaTauri62+1 lap0
13Lewis HamiltonMercedes62+1 lap0
14Esteban OconAlpine62+1 lap0
15Zhou GuanyuAlfa Romeo62+1 lap0
16Nicholas LatifiWilliams62+1 lap0
17Mick SchumacherHaas62+1 lap0
18Daniel RicciardoMcLaren62+1 lap0
19Fernando AlonsoAlpine6DNF0
20Carlos SainzFerrari0DNF0

Continue Reading

2022 F1

Hamilton and Wolff spotted in heated conversation after Imola disaster

Published

on

By

Lewis Hamilton 2022 F1 Emilia Romagna Grand Prix

During Emilia Romagna Grand Prix post qualifying session, Sir Lewis Hamilton and his Mercedes team principal Toto Wolff was seen engaging in a heated conversation, the Brit was eliminated from Q2 on Friday.

Bothe Hamilton and Wolff be found to be holding heated conversations in the Mercedes garage just after the Brit crashed out of Q2 at the Emilia Romagna Grand Prix. It was another poor results, which was resulted P13 in for sprint race at Imola.

On the incident with Wolff, Hamilton said: “It’s all internal stuff. I’d rather not share that. But yeah we’ll keep working, it is what it is. Each weekend is a rescue.

“It wasn’t a great session. Yeah. Naturally, it’s disappointing. We came here with optimism and we know everyone is working really hard at the factory and when things don’t come together it’s disappointing. I think we under-performed as a team today.

“There are things that we should have done and didn’t do. Anyway, we will work as hard as we can to move up in the sprint race. Hopefully tomorrow is better, weather-wise, and who knows, maybe we can work our way forwards.”

Continue Reading

SAUDI GRAND PRIX

Date Session Time
FRI DEC 03 FP1 16:30 - 17:30
FRI DEC 03 FP2 20:00 - 21:00
SAT DEC 04 FP3 17:00 - 18:00
SAT DEC 04 QUALI 20:00 - 21:00
SUN DEC 05 RACE 20:30 - 23:30

Latest F1 News

Max Verstappen wins 2022 Imola GP Max Verstappen wins 2022 Imola GP
2022 F14 months ago

F1 Championship Points Standing – After Imola GP

2022 F1 Drivers Championship Standing after F1 Emilia Romagna GP 2022 F1 Teams Championship Standing after F1 Imola Emilia Romagna...

Max Verstappen and Sergio Perez 2022 F1 Imola GP Max Verstappen and Sergio Perez 2022 F1 Imola GP
2022 F14 months ago

Race results – F1 Imola Emilia Romagna GP

Defending world champion Max Verstappen has won at Imola for the second season in a row ahead of his teammate...

Lewis Hamilton 2022 F1 Emilia Romagna Grand Prix Lewis Hamilton 2022 F1 Emilia Romagna Grand Prix
2022 F14 months ago

Hamilton and Wolff spotted in heated conversation after Imola disaster

During Emilia Romagna Grand Prix post qualifying session, Sir Lewis Hamilton and his Mercedes team principal Toto Wolff was seen...

Lewis Hamilton 2022 Italian GP Lewis Hamilton 2022 Italian GP
2022 F14 months ago

100% committed to Mercedes, but feeling painful – Hamilton

Seven-time F1 world champion Lewis Hamilton and his team Mercedes struggling too much with new aero concept, since beginning of...

Charles Leclerc 2022 Australian GP Charles Leclerc 2022 Australian GP
2022 F14 months ago

2022 F1 Championship Points Standing after Australian GP

Charles Leclerc made a dominant victory for Ferrari; reigning world champion Max Verstappen suffers another DNF with Red Bull engine...

2022 Australia GP Qualifying 2022 Australia GP Qualifying
2022 F14 months ago

Australian Grand Prix Qualifying Results

TOP TEN 1. Charles Leclerc [Ferrari] 1.17.868s 2. Max Verstappen [Red Bull] 1.18.154 3. Sergio Perez [Red Bull] 1.18.240 4....

Nikita Mazepin Russian F1 Driver Nikita Mazepin Russian F1 Driver
2022 F15 months ago

Russian driver Mazepin’s F1 contract terminated by Haas

Following the cruel Russian military attack against Ukraine, American based F1 squad Haas F1 has terminated its title sponsorship with...

Charles Leclerc Day 2 2022 F1 Testing Charles Leclerc Day 2 2022 F1 Testing
2022 F16 months ago

Day 2 Results: 2022 F1 Barcelona pre-season test

Ferrari’s Charles Leclerc completed another trouble-free run to set the pace in the second day of preseason testing at the...

2022 Red Bull F1 - Pre-season Testing 2022 Red Bull F1 - Pre-season Testing
2022 F16 months ago

F1 2022 Live Timing: Day 2 – Pre-Season Test at Barcelona

Second day 2022 Formula 1 pre-season start at the Barcelona circuit in Spain. Follow the live timing till now with...

Lando Norris 2022 F1 Pre-season testing Lando Norris 2022 F1 Pre-season testing
2022 F16 months ago

Day 1 results: 2022 F1 Barcelona pre-season test

McLaren youngster Lando Norris made fastest lap time on Wednesday at the Circuit de Barcelona-Cataluyna as 2022 F1 pre-season testing...

Trending